Keep reading our post to know what are the difference between beats solo 3 and studio 3.
- 1 Overview
- 2 Beats Solo 3 vs Beats Studio 3
- 3 FAQs
- 4 Verdict
What is Beats Solo3?
Despite the Beats Solo3’s excellent quality and simple connectivity thanks to the W1 chip, some people might find their mix to be a little too heavy on the low end. Numerous reviewers also mention how readily the plastic cracks.
- The popularity of on-ear headphones is often higher due to its portability and light weight, according to Solo3. They can deliver a more purely “open” sound because they don’t entirely enclose the ear. Despite the Solo 3’s lack of Active Sounds Cancellation compared to the Studio 3’s, they nevertheless do a fantastic job at muting outside noise.
- Even though they don’t completely cover the ear, the earpads are secure and rather comfy, keeping them in place.
- Only 5 minutes of fast charging are needed on the Solo 3 to reach the full 3 hours of playback.
- Due to the thinner earpads, they are more likely to move when sweating. Additionally, if used during exercise, they can get quite warm.
- This model’s construction is arguably fragile, rendering it more vulnerable to significant damages than to scratches or scuffs.
- It won’t be as easy to connect over Bluetooth if you don’t intend to use an Apple gadget. Even after only a few months of service, some customers have complained about network problems.
What is Beats Studio 3?
In comparison to the Solo3, the Beats Studio3 offers active noise cancellation, a more well-balanced audio profile, and an over-ear style that is more comfortable when worn for extended periods of time.
Studio 3 Pros:
- Because of the over-ear design, you may anticipate natural sound isolation and hearing only the sounds you wish to hear. Expect a reliable 22 hours of listening if Active Noise Cancellation is your style after a full charge. The earpads by themselves provide a sizable level of passive noise suppression.
- Customers comment that despite being bigger and heavier, these are a wonderful choice for all-day wear. Despite being primarily designed for sedentary, studio use, the enveloping fit guarantees that they don’t slide with movement.
- Fast Fuel, a characteristic of this model, charges in just 10 minutes and provides 3 hours of playback time.
Studio 3 Cons:
- Unlike previous versions, they are neither sweat- or water-resistant, hence Beats advises keeping the headphones dry. It may be best to use caution or to rethink taking them to the gym or outside in the weather.
- Although the Studio 3 is compatible with other manufacturers, using Apple goods is the only way to get the best results. With Android, battery life and Bluetooth performance are less reliable.
- Simply said, it costs more than the Solo 3, but prices are comparable to those of other noise-canceling headphones available.
Why Are Beats So Expensive?
If there is one brand that has led the pack in promoting the idea that stylishness is equally as important as clear audio quality, it is Beats.
The company’s most recent inventions have served as a reminder of its continual advancement in areas where new-age technology has made advances, even though marketing achievements over the past ten years have elevated the household name into the good graces of celebrities across a variety of genres.
Many detractors focus on the powerful bass that is a trademark of the brand, but when you take into account how modern music is produced, Beats headphones accept the demand for low-end sound better than most of their rivals.
Beats Solo 3 vs Beats Studio 3
Beats Studio 3 vs Beats Solo3 Commons Features
The W1 chip from Apple provides quick device pairing and reconnecting along with a strong, dependable Bluetooth connection. With compatible software, you don’t have to compromise on sound quality or battery life to get more listening time.
Each model instantly connects to the last known device even after being shut down, and switching between associated devices just takes a few seconds.
Beats has changed the look of its Android app to replicate the Bluetooth features available on Apple devices. It allows you to rapidly pair your headphones, check the state of your battery, install updates, and manage the Active Noise Cancellation function that the Studio 3 offers.
40 hours of playback are provided by Studio 3 and Solo 3 in their basic settings.
Differences between Beats Solo3 and Beats Studio 3
Design & Build
While Studio 3 features an over-ear design, Solo 3 is an on-ear model.
There is hardly any variation in the way they appear on the outside except from this distinction. Both have a smooth, curving appearance without any sharp edges.
Beats made an effort to maintain a simple, minimalist appearance. The majority of their body pieces are composed of lovely matte-finished plastic.
For greater longevity, only the fold-up hinge and the headband’s skeleton are made of metal.
These two Beats headphones are no exception to the rule; all Beats headphones have loud “b” logos on both of their earcups.
Although synthetic imitation leather is used to cover the foam padding, it is not very practical.
Nowadays, synthetic materials resemble actual objects almost imperceptibly, yet this one appears to be made of plastic.
Although the headband’s plastic coating is prone to scratches, the overall construction feels upscale and well-made.
Additionally, both models may be folded into a small size for simple transportation and have adjustable headbands.
There don’t seem to be any major changes between the design and construction of these two, thus.
Getting back to Beats Studio 3’s comfort aspect, it is incredibly pleasant.
The pressure is adequately dispersed around your ears and there is adequate padding in the earcups.
Additionally, the clamping force is respectable, giving you a solid fit.
Although I can’t deny that the headband seems a little stiff to me and isn’t as well-padded as the earcups, I can guarantee you that this won’t be a significant problem that will impair your comfort.
I didn’t feel overly worn out after our extended listening session. They appeared to be doing quite fine.
Due to its over-ear design, Studio 3 is more comfortable than Solo 3’s on-ear design. Unlike the Solo 3, it won’t press against your ears. Instead, it will completely enclose your ears without generating any itching.
Speaking of the Beats Solo 3, while it is padded and soft, it is still not up to par to compete with Studio 3.
I couldn’t be all that satisfied by its clamping force.
Furthermore, its headband won’t be up to par to let you continue the extended listening session. Over time, tiredness will set in.
Regarding breathability, both headphones exhibit an average level of performance.
They won’t heat up your ears much if you just sit back and listen to music while doing nothing, but they are not recommended for use in the gym or during light exercise. Using these two headphones while working out will cause you to perspire a little more than usual.
It’s important to consider a headphone’s sound quality. In fact, I’ll say that it’s the quality about which you should be most worried.
Studio 3 and Solo 3 both offer good quality sound.
Both models have a decent amount of bass. For music styles like EDM and hip-hop, they offer a strong thud and boom.
Well, in terms of the bass output of these two headphones, I didn’t anticipate anything else. Since Beats is known for its powerful bass response, they wouldn’t be deserving of the Beats brand if they didn’t have it.
However, in the instance of Solo 3, the strong bass may make the vocals and lead instruments seem a little muddy and untidy.
And speaking of the mids, they can be a little hazy and ill-defined in both models, but the Solo 3 makes this more obvious.
On each pair, the treble sounds crisp and clear. They don’t sound at all jumbled or muffled.
Solo 3 and Studio 3 both have nice sound quality if I look at them separately, however Studio 3 sounds superior in comparison.
It has a louder and clearer sound than its rival. The audio in Studio 3 will remain audible and distinct even if you turn up the volume.
Beats Studio 3 will be a superior option for you overall.
By the way, I almost forgot to mention that neither pair of headphones will give you the opportunity to change the sound.
Now we are aware of the noise-canceling differences between the Beats Solo and Studio 3.
As you are aware, Solo 3 does not have active noise cancellation (ANC), although Beats Studio 3 has.
Let’s start by discussing Studio 3.
Although Studio 3’s performance isn’t up to par with the best noise-canceling headphones, like the Sony WH 1000Xm3 or the Bose QuietComfort 35 II, it still performs admirably.
They are better at eliminating mid-range noises like background talk.
Therefore, if your colleagues’ chatter is making it difficult for you to focus on your work, these headphones will do a good job of blocking it out.
Additionally, by reducing background noise from family members, these headphones might help you focus on your study.
They are also capable of successfully reducing high-pitched noises like the humming of an air conditioner.
However, Studio 3 struggles to block out low-frequency noises like trains or jet engines.
In contrast, Solo 3’s closed-back design passively isolates the background noise.
In all honesty, if you’re in a crowded place, this headset won’t work very well for you.
Even the mid-range ambient chatter is difficult to remove, let alone the bass-range noises.
On the other hand, Solo 3 just slightly performs better with higher-pitched sounds.
Call Quality or Microphone
The Solo 3 microphone’s ability to handle noise is subpar. Actually, it would be ideal if I stated that the microphone quality was poor.
Even in a fairly noisy area, it has trouble distinguishing your speech from the background noise.
And if you answer a call in a busy area, your voice will be muffled.
In contrast, Studio 3’s microphone is far superior than Solo 3’s.
The call quality will be stable, and the person on the other end will be able to hear you without any issues whether you are having a phone conversation at home or in a crowded street.
An essential aspect of a wireless Bluetooth headphone that should be examined before buying is its battery life.
Even though you already have a general notion, you can read the next section for further information.
These two headphones both have long-lasting batteries. Solo 3 significantly outperforms Studio 3 in this regard, though.
While Studio 3 will give you 22 hours of battery life with ANC enabled, Solo 3 has a 40-hour battery life.
However, it will support you for up to 40 hours, just like the Solo 3, if you play it while disabling the ANC.
Well, Beats Studio 3 and Solo 3 both have relatively similar control schemes.
The left earcup houses all of the playback controls and call management settings.
The left “b” button can be clicked, and multiple actions can be taken by pressing it once, twice, or three times while holding them down.
It functions as a play/pause button, a skip button for moving to the next or previous track, a phone answer/end button, and a voice assistant button.
And to change the volume, push the “b” button’s upper and lower halves, respectively.
You must click the power button twice to turn on the ANC in Studio 3.
Their score for this phase should be tied because their control systems don’t differ significantly from one another.
While Solo3 offers passable Bluetooth compatibility, Studio 3’s performance in this regard is more commendable.
Sadly, neither one of them enables NFC pairing or multi-pairing.
However, they have an Apple W1 chip, which makes it simple to synchronize with other iOS devices.
You won’t experience much lag on iOS and Android. Their latency is larger on PCs, but it is still perfectly fine and ignorable. You might experience problems with the audio and video synchronizing.
Speaking of connection strength, I discovered Studio 3 to be a little more reliable and stable than the Solo3.
Anyhow, they both support the Bluetooth codecs AAC and SBC.
On iOS devices, AAC is used for high-quality streaming; however, if you have an Android device, you must use SBC streaming because AAC performs unevenly on non-iOS devices.
Find out other comparisons: Apple Vs Sony Headphones- AirPods Max vs Sony WH-1000XM4
Which One Should You Buy?
The Beats Solo3 and Beats Studio 3 are two of the most popular headphones on the market. Both headphones offer excellent sound quality and comfort, but there are some key differences between them.
The Beats Solo3 are on-ear headphones, while the Beats Studio 3 are over-ear headphones. The Beats Solo3 is also wireless, while the Beats Studio 3 is wired. Finally, the Beats Solo3 has a battery life of 40 hours, while the Beats Studio 3 has a battery life of 20 hours.
What Are The Alternatives?
As an alternative to the Beats Studio 3 and Solo 3, you can choose any of the following headphones.
- Sony WH-1000XM4
- AKG Noise Canceling Headphones (N60)
Consider purchasing the Sony WH-1000XM4, one of the greatest noise-canceling headphones on the market, if you have the money.
This headphone has a neutral sound profile and is quite comfy. The Sony headphones Connect app allows you to customize the sound if it doesn’t meet your needs.
AKG headphones, on the other hand, continue to provide excellent wireless audio quality through Bluetooth. AptX and AAC codecs are supported for high-quality streaming. Additionally, it is a lightweight headphone that is cozy to wear for extended periods of time.
This kind of headset can be your best choice if you want a less expensive solution.
Why Are Prices Inconsistent?
Based on a variety of variables, various retailers can set varying price margins. To ensure you receive an authentic device, Beats advises purchasing from an authorized retailer. Online marketplaces frequently have counterfeit technology.
Can I Make Adjustments to My Listening Experience Without Pulling Out My Paired Device?
Yes. You can use the buttons on the left ear cup to increase or decrease the volume and the button on the right ear cup to switch between the paired device’s audio source and the phone call.
The Solo3 is suggested if you prefer on-ear headphones because they are lighter and more breathable.
Frequent travelers might like them because they are slightly more inexpensive and compact, taking up less space when folded in your pocket. However, because of their poorer overall usability compared to Studio3, they are less suited to noisy environments.
Although their snug on-ear fit is more breathable than an over-ear fit, it is frequently less practical for extended listening sessions. If you prefer on-ear headphones with ANC for better noise isolation, look into the more costly Solo Pro.